|








|
 |
Wag the Dog (1997)
    
_150w.jpg) |
Directed by:
Barry
Levinson |
|
COUNTRY
USA |
|
GENRE
Comedy/Political satire |
|
NORWEGIAN TITLE
Wag
the Dog – når halen logrer med hunden |
|
RUNNING TIME
97
minutes |
|
Produced by:
Jane
Rosenthal
Robert De Niro
Barry Levinson |
Written by:
Hilary Henkin
David Mamet |
Review
Political satire is hardly
abundant in cinema, and certainly not in Hollywood. In general, politics
has been kept somewhat at arm’s length in films since the politically
charged 1970s. With that backdrop, Barry Levinson’s Wag the Dog is an enjoyable experience
– a loose and inventive satirical affair that works better for its sharp-edged
commentary than
as a story.
At the center of this media-manipulation circus are two Hollywood
legends: Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro. Despite both being defining
stars of the '70s (and reliable Oscar magnets), they’d barely shared
screen time until Levinson brought them together for
Sleepers
in 1996 – and even then, only briefly. Here, they’re front and center,
playing off each other with practiced ease and anchoring much of the
film’s appeal. Hoffman steals most of the spotlight, delivering a
performance built entirely around a very '90s cinematic trope:
coolness. Nearly every line he delivers gets its punch not from depth
or emotion, but from stylized swagger. His character is quirky rather
than complex, but often hilarious in the way only a self-important
Hollywood producer can be. De Niro, by contrast, operates in a much more
subdued register. Like much of his '90s output, his performance leans
heavily on sheer technique. He’s watchable, certainly, but there's a
sense of him running at half-power – his charisma dialed down, his
engagement a little muted. Still, when he and Hoffman share the screen,
something clicks. Their rhythm works.
The film is structured almost entirely around a central idea rather than
a fully developed story. And that idea – the sheer scale to which public
perception can be manipulated by media spin – is explored with often
sharp, occasionally inspired comic precision. A handful of scenes still
stand out as minor gems: a brainstorm session with Willie Nelson as the
campaign’s official jingle-writer, or the absurd debate about the colour
of the kitten in a fabricated war photo. It’s satire that understands
the absurdity of both politics and showbiz, and how the two are
increasingly indistinguishable.
But as sharp as the concept is, Wag the Dog eventually starts to
feel like a sketch stretched to feature length. It presents its core
idea over and over, in different variations, but doesn’t develop a
narrative that can truly carry it. Characters are rarely more than
vehicles for commentary. The story doesn’t build – it circles. You’re
left admiring individual scenes, moments, and lines, but rarely feeling
pulled in.
That’s a structural issue – and the blame lands partly with Levinson,
and partly with screenwriters Henkin and Mamet. What they had was a
brilliant conceit, but not a script that knew how to sustain it. Without
a dramatic engine to keep things moving, the film inevitably sags in
places. It doesn’t collapse, but it coasts. And when a movie reduces the
viewer to an observer rather than a participant, it needs to keep
throwing out fresh insights or surprises to hold your attention. Wag
the Dog does this – until it doesn’t. For all its potential, the
film ultimately falls into a similar trap as Sleepers: big
ideas, top-tier cast, flashes of brilliance – but a structure that
underdelivers. Copyright ©
27.03.98 Fredrik Gunerius Fevang
(English version: © 14.10.2025 Fredrik Gunerius Fevang) |
|