|
|
|
Shortbus
(2006)
Pioneering film critic Pauline Kael once said about her career that she was honoured to have been working as a critic during the 1960s and '70s – a time when she felt filmmakers still took risks and dared to make controversial movies. I think my biggest compliment to John Cameron Mitchell's Shortbus is that this is one such film that Kael would be happy to review. It is a daring, groundbreaking and playful film about almost anything sexual – except the most ordinary. The power of Shortbus isn't about narrative, but about character and situation. It's an inside look at a New York gay scene spiced up with some heterosexuals here and there (though arguably not your average types). Mitchell is inventive and playful but most of all bold, as he includes more graphic sex than in any other non-pornographic film I've ever seen. What's good is the respect, warmth and carefreeness with which it is presented. The performers seem to have a lot of fun too, with the level of creativity maintained also in the sexual interactions themselves. Unfortunately, Mitchell isn't equally daring thematically as he is graphically. The film touches on almost every possible sexual theme, but most of it is either done a bit too neatly or with a lack of realism and insight (the Sofia character being the least authentic). Some characters (James, Jamie, Tobias) work much better than others (Sofia, Rob, Severin), but the film maintains an edgy and amusing dialogue throughout as well as some great visual compositions. This is where Mitchell hits his peak. Alas, his all too neat and convenient wrap-up ultimately makes Shortbus a tad too lightweight to make a truly lasting emotional impact.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||