|







 
|
 |
Rope
(1948)
    
 |
Director:
Alfred
Hitchcock |
COUNTRY
USA |
GENRE
Thriller/Drama |
NORWEGIAN
TITLE
Repet |
RUNNING
TIME
80
minutes |
|
Producer:
Sidney Bernstein
Alfred
Hitchcock |
Screenwriter
(based on a play by Patrick Hamilton):
Arthur
Laurents
Hume Cronyn |
Review
One
of few films by Hitchcock that is more noteworthy for its technical
aspects than the thematic. Rope works well on a base level,
telling the tale of two spoiled rich kids who commit murder for the heck of it, under the illusion that as members of the intellectual and social
elite, they are entitled to do so. As a murder mystery (or rather
a post-murder mystery) the film is effective, with numerous playful
situations centered around the presence of the dead body at a dinner
party. Not untraditionally, this is what becomes Hitchcock's focal point,
and coupled with Arthur Laurents' delightful dialogue, the film is full
of delicate and macabre wit that keeps it alive and highlights Hitchcock's
brilliant comic timing.
He impresses with his camera too, letting it
glide around the film's one and only set, presenting the narrative with
impressive flux, deploying cuts only when the reel changes required it
(which was at about every ten minutes). The theatrical quality of the
piece calls for strong characterizations, but unfortunately, Hitchcock
becomes somewhat vague when discussing the most potent aspects of the script: the implied homosexuality and the philosophical
foundation that inspired the murder in the first place – centered around
Nietzsche's idea of the Übermensch. Regarding both these aspects,
there is a certain tension between the Dall and Granger characters, but James
Stewart's character doesn't quite work. He's a fine protagonist in his detective-like
capacity, but becomes too much of a theoretical, non-potent guise in
regard to the two aforementioned aspects, making Rope a less edgy
and more forgettable document of its time than it might have been. As it
stands, the film lacks both the harrowing suspense and the thematic layers that characterized Hitchcock's
best work.
|
|