|
|
|
Harry
Potter and the Preceded
by:
Harry
Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)
The third entry in the series, directed by Mike Newell, is first and foremost a nice coming-of-age drama, with fine performances by the three young leads, Radcliffe, Watson and Grint. There are emotions stirring, including love, friendship, insecurity, jealousy and restrained sexuality. Newell does well to let the actors express themselves, and there are some wonderful scenes set during a ball which dramatically surpasses everything the series has had to offer so far. In contrast to the two former entries, The Goblet of Fire offers a continuation of the story on a more comprehensive level – pitting Harry against Lord Voldemort himself, intriguingly portrayed by Ralph Fiennes. This and the subsequent concluding scenes are exciting and well-executed, but the contest our young magicians are put through in order to get there is disappointingly run-of-the-mill, with one-dimensional characters, irrelevant events and, of course, never any real doubt as to who the winner is going to be. Rowling throws every trick she knows into the fantasy mixer (or goblet, if you like), and screenwriter Steve Kloves adapts it eagerly and uncritically to the screen format. Some sequences are good (the Brendan Gleeson character is both cleverly written and expertly acted), but at some point you may question just how many characters a film can handle without becoming too cluttered. It also doesn't make matters better that the most important of them are the least interesting. I'd rather this film was named "Neville Longbottom and the Goblet of Fire", because that Harry Potter kid is turning into something of a mushy, over-considerate, unflawed bore.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||